In re Kansas Indians (original) (raw)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1867 United States Supreme Court case

In re Kansas Indians
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued April 2, 1867Decided May 6, 1867
Full case name The Kansas Indians
Citations 72 U.S. 737 (more)5 Wall. 737; 18 L. Ed. 667
Case history
Prior Blue-Jacket v. Johnson County Com'rs, 3 Kan. 299 (1865); Miami County Com'rs v. Wan-zop-pe-che, 3 Kan. 364 (1865)
Holding
The state of Kansas was not authorized to levy taxes on, and seize for forfeiture, lands which are set aside for Indian tribes by the United States government, under treaty or otherwise.
Court membership
Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase Associate Justices James M. Wayne · Samuel NelsonRobert C. Grier · Nathan CliffordNoah H. Swayne · Samuel F. MillerDavid Davis · Stephen J. Field
Case opinion
Majority Davis, joined by unanimous
Superseded by
Statute, as stated in Ariz. v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, 463 U.S. 545 (1983)

In re Kansas Indians, 72 U.S. (5 Wall.) 737 (1867), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the state of Kansas was not authorized to levy taxes on, and seize for forfeiture, lands which are set aside for Indian tribes by the United States government, under treaty or otherwise.

The Kansas Indians case developed from three separate cases. Both Kansas and New York tried to tax the land of individual Indians.[1] The Shawnee tribe moved to Kansas from Ohio and Missouri from 1825 to 1831, and were not to be considered part of the land of any state.[2] In 1854, the tribe partitioned the land among its members, with the restriction that the land could not be sold without the permission of the United States.[3] The Wea tribe was in a similar position, as was the Miami tribe.[4]

In all three cases, the local counties levied property taxes on land belonging to members of the tribe, and the tribes objected. The Kansas Supreme Court heard two of the cases, and ruled that the taxes were proper as the Indians held fee simple title to the land.[5]

Justice David Davis delivered the opinion of the Court. The Court held that a state could not levy taxes on the property of a tribe while the tribe was recognized by the United States.[6]

The citations in this article are written in Bluebook style. Please see the talk page for more information.

  1. ^ Carole Goldberg, The State-Tribe Relationship, in 2 Handbook of North American Indians: Indians in Contemporary Society 68 (Garrick A. Bailey & William C. Sturtevant eds. 2008).
  2. ^ In re Kansas Indians, 72 U.S. (5 Wall.) 737, 738-39 (1867) (procedural preface to opinion of the Court).
  3. ^ In re Kansas Indians, 72 U.S. at 740 (preface).
  4. ^ In re Kansas Indians, 72 U.S. at 741-42 (preface).
  5. ^ In re Kansas Indians, 72 U.S. at 750-51 (preface).
  6. ^ Lincoln B. Smith, Indians, in 3 Indian Affairs: Laws and Treaties 745 n.23 (Charles J. Kappler ed. 1913).