peps: 1d290942c24d (original) (raw)

Mercurial > peps

changeset 48:1d290942c24d

Added Paul's latest crop of names to the list of proposed alternatives in Open Issues.

Barry Warsaw barry@python.org
date	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 22:00:05 +0000
parents	0be37909cd50
children	15df0f2a1b39
files	pep-0201.txt
diffstat	1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)[+] [-] pep-0201.txt 11

line wrap: on

line diff

--- a/pep-0201.txt +++ b/pep-0201.txt @@ -375,10 +375,13 @@ Open Issues with the zip compression algorithm. Other suggestions include (but are not limited to!): marry, weave, parallel, lace, braid, interlace, permute, furl, tuples, lists, stitch, collate, knit,

 plait, fold, and with.  All have disadvantages, and there is no[](#l1.7)

 clear unanimous choice, therefore the decision was made to go[](#l1.8)

 with `zip' because the same functionality is available in other[](#l1.9)

 languages (e.g. Haskell) under the name `zip'[2].[](#l1.10)

 plait, fold, with, mktuples, maketuples, totuples, gentuples,[](#l1.11)

```
 tupleorama.[](#l1.12)
```

 All have disadvantages, and there is no clear unanimous choice,[](#l1.14)

 therefore the decision was made to go with `zip' because the[](#l1.15)

 same functionality is available in other languages[](#l1.16)

 (e.g. Haskell) under the name `zip'[2].[](#l1.17)

- Should zip() be including in the builtins module or should it be in a separate generators module (possibly with other candidate