(original) (raw)


On Jul 31, 2015, at 1:07 PM, Owen Anderson <resistor@mac.com> wrote:


On Jul 31, 2015, at 1:01 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo@gmail.com> wrote:



On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:40 PM Eric Christopher <echristo@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:22 PM Owen Anderson <resistor@mac.com> wrote:

On Jul 31, 2015, at 11:28 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com> wrote:


On Jul 31, 2015, at 10:56 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo@gmail.com> wrote:


On 30 July 2015 at 14:52, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders@imgtec.com> wrote:
> We will need a string serialization of the TargetTuple so that we can store it in the IR and read it back.

Why does it have to be in the IR? If every tool that deals with IR has
the same options and they mean the same thing I don't see why we'd
need that.


I agree with the need for serializing information and options into the module.

> Whether this is in one piece (e.g. 'target tuple = "...") or multiple pieces (e.g. 'target arch = "..."', 'target endian = "..."') doesn't matter too much at first but I can see the benefits of the latter being the end point. If we do choose that multiple pieces then I'd like to pass through the former first to keep the early steps of the migration to a TargetTuple as simple and mechanical as possible.

Assuming we really need it, wouldn't it work if we put in metadata?
That way, it would bloat the IR of targets that really needed it and
not the ones that don't, at the same time as being non-critical to
parsing and validating the IR, so you could safely drop some
information without breaking the file.


Metadata won't work. Metadata is defined to not affect code correctness and this obviously does.


Is it true for Module level Metadata and not only for instruction attached one?


Wow, those are terrible. I remember the first as it was a hack for dealing with LTO and being unable to specify code generation flags. It definitely was not meant to affect whether or not correct output happened.

The rest appear to be even worse and should not have gone in. I can prepare a patch to remove them if you'd like.

In case it wasn't obvious this is me both being sad, mostly joking, and a little serious about it. I realize that apparently the ship has sailed here, but these should probably be first class IR citizens rather than building off of the "named metadata" extension.

The problem with this direction is that clients need to be able to extend the IR with their own additional annotations according to their own schemas. We cannot practically bake all of those in as first-class IR citizens.
To throw in another example, SPIR 1.2 uses module metadata for required-for-correctness purposes: https://www.khronos.org/files/opencl-spir-12-provisional.pdf

As does NVVM: http://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/nvvm-ir-spec/index.html#global-property-annotation-chapter-11

—Owen