(original) (raw)



On Oct 23, 2018, at 9:53 AM, Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev <llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:

\[resending with a bugfix s/x/y/ in my example\]

We still have to support constant dbg.values that need to be at a specific point in the instruction stream and don't refer to any SSA value.

For example, we can still have code like this:

int x = foo();
int y = 42;
bar();
y = x;
baz();

that might lower into IR like

%x = call i32 @foo()
call void @llvm.dbg.value(i32 %x, DIVariable("x"), ...)
call void @llvm.dbg.value(i32 42, DIVariable("y"), ...)
call void @bar()
call void @llvm.dbg.value(i32 %x, DIVariable("y"), ...) ; %x is not materialized here, and we also can't hoist this.
call void @foo()

Maybe I am misunderstanding the proposal, but I would imagine this to be modeled similar to this:

%x = call i32 @foo() !debug-variable X0, !debug-variable Y1
call @bar()
call @foo()

now we have two tables for the X and Y debug variables:

X0 (line xxx-yyy)

Y0 - Constant 42 (line xxx-yyy)
Y1 (line yyy-zzz)

- Matthias