(original) (raw)
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 11:18 AM Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak@nexgo.de> wrote:
"David Blaikie" <dblaikie@gmail.com> wrote:
\> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 7:11 AM Sanjay Patel via llvm-dev <
\> llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
\[...\]
\>> Finally, sending mail to llvm-bugs is practically useless. I don't know of
\>> anyone that is tracking mails to that list rather than actual bug reports.
\>>
\>
\> The list is setup to not accept email, basically
That's VERY nice for a mailing list. NOT!
This sort of antagonistic/sarcastic language isn't really conducive to a productive discussion - please avoid it in future discussions with the LLVM community (others have mentioned this already/previously).
\> - I'm one of the moderators there & any email sent there that doesn't
\> come from the bug database will get automatically or manually rejected
\> with the suggestion/request that the bug database is used instead.
NO!
The following text is sent back:
| You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has
| been automatically rejected. If you think that your messages are
| being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at
| llvm-bugs-owner@lists.llvm.org.
Yeah, I just went through the mail filtering this morning - and since other people (& myself here) had already explained why llvm-bugs wasn't an appropriate mailing list to send to - I didn't write a more comprehensive response & used the auto-response when rejecting all those emails.
I recommend/request that this list EITHER be opened for bug reports,
OR not announced on <http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo> any more!
It's useful to have it listed there - people subscribe to it to read the bug reports that are filed through the bugzilla instance.
- Dave
Stefan
\[ fullquote removed \]