(original) (raw)

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 2:16 AM Michael Platings via llvm-dev <llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:

Regarding a plan for conversion, I'm keen to avoid perfect being the enemy of better.

It seems a bit early to discuss conversion given there’s not consensus on a style. For example:

If we imagine that over time it evolves such that 50% of the variables have been renamed to camelBack versions of the type names, then it will look like this:

This comment seems to assume that camelBack is the agreed upon style and all we need to do now is move forward, and I do not believe that to be the case