(original) (raw)

On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 15:24, Zachary Turner <zturner@google.com> wrote:
\> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 2:16 AM Michael Platings via llvm-dev <llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
\>>
\>> Regarding a plan for conversion, I'm keen to avoid perfect being the enemy of better.
\>
\>
\> It seems a bit early to discuss conversion given there’s not consensus on a style. For example:

I see it a bit differently. The first question is "should we change
the LLVM naming conventions". I view the plan for conversion as
essential to answering this question - IMHO if we're going to live
with mixed styles for years (which would be the case if there were no
concerted conversion effort) then the advantages of changing naming
convention are outweighed by the disadvantages by quite some way