(original) (raw)

<paul.robinson@sony.com> writes:

\>> "lower\_case" is a pretty drastic change from CamelCase and camelCase.
\>> So far the only argument for it I've seen is, "lldb uses it all over the
\>> place." Having one subproject drive the standard for everything else
\>> seems backward. It's certainly possible I missed other opinions on this
\>> though.
\>
\> You have. For example, here's a "significant improvement" comment:
\> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130214.html

But I see nothing there about \*why\* it would be a "significant
improvement." At best I see an allusion to something like, "this is
really different than anytyhing we've done before so it doesn't conflict
with any existing naming." If I've misinterpreted I hope Chandler will
correct me.