Minutes RDF DAWG telecon 2005-03-15 for review from Kevin Wilkinson on 2005-03-18 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from January to March 2005) (original) (raw)

Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2005-03-15 for review

RDF Data Access WG telcon 2005-03-15T14:30Z

Agenda:

<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0304.html> Note: agenda items are renumbered in these minutes to account for two item 2's in original agenda. Additions to agenda:

<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0305.html>

<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0306.html>

IRC log: <http://www.w3.org/2005/03/15-dawg-irc>

chair: DanC

scribe: Kevin

  1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda

Attendees: Kendall Clark, Kevin Wilkinson, Eric Prud'hommeaux, Andy Seaborne, Dan Connolly, Janne Saarela, Steve Harris, Jos De Roo, Howard Katz

Regrets: Hiroyuki Sato

Next meeting: 22 Mar; scribe: JanneS

continue the following without discussion: ACTION Bijan: to propose text (story? etc.) to support WSDL requirement CONTINUED

ACTION EricP: to review WSDL text proposal CONTINUED

ACTION AndyS: to clarify 5.4 w/r/t closed world assumption CONTINUED

ACTION AndyS: to explain how to get a whole graph with CONSTRUCT * and GRAPH. CONTINUED

ACTION DaveB: to consider use of xsi:dataType ala comment from Steer CONTINUED

ACTION EricP: to propose to close valueTesting (bonus points for test cases, to EricP or others) CONTINUED

  1. ftf5-bos records

PROPOSED: to approve http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf5-bos.html Revision:1.48Revision: 1.48 Revision:1.48 of Date:2005/03/0722:37:39Date: 2005/03/07 22:37:39 Date:2005/03/0722:37:39 with the @@s removed RESOLVED to approve

  1. SPARQL Protocol, SADDLE update

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0286.html

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ 1.19 is progress on some of these... ACTION KendallC: discuss warnings in the protocol spec. CONTINUED

ACTION KendallC: to add WSDL description of protocol to editor's draft, propose to WG: CONTINUED

ACTION KendallC: to add "since we're using WSDL, you can use WS-Policy..." to protocol draft CONTINUED

ACTION KendallC: to incorporate service description discussion notes in protocol spec DONE

  1. test updates from punctuationSyntax

ACTION SteveH: to to propose tests for str() and =~ DONE

ACTION: SteveH to update the tests to reflect the new syntax http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0298.html DONE

I take that as a proposal to (re-)approve these tests: PROPOSED: to approve these tests (note rename of query-example-2* from original agenda as per addition to agenda noted, above) http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-a http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-b http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-c http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-d RESOLVED: to approve

PROPOSED: to approve these tests http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-001 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-002 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-003 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-004 RESOLVED: to approve

ACTION SteveH: to propose accepting the test http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-d

  1. Test suite maintenance

ACTION EricP: to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page CONTINUED

ACTION SteveH: to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named graphs CONTINUED

ACTION DaveB: to to propose source test to approve CONTINUED

ACTION JosD: Jos to propose an optional test based on ACTION op:dateTime triple CONTINUED

ACTION AndyS: to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases) CONTINUED

ACTION JosD: propose a test based on dawg-triple-pattern-002? with a '.' in a qname

  1. Sorting issue/requirement?

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0296.html

PROPOSED: add something like "it should be possible to sort the results" as a design objective RESOLVED: to accept

ACTION AndyS: propose a SORT design ACTION KendallC: add a sort objective ACTION DanC: add SORT issue

  1. Privacy/Security issue/requirement/objective?

ACTION DanC: to consider adding 'privacy/security' issue, even if we're most likely to just postpone it or mention it in passing in specs DONE

ACTION EricP: propose "privacy considerations" for SPARQL protocol

ADJOURN 15:20:55

Received on Friday, 18 March 2005 19:04:08 UTC