distributed meeting 2007-05-22 (v2) from Thomas Roessler on 2007-05-22 (public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org from May 2007) (original) (raw)

(This version fills in some additional information; no substantive changes.)

22 May, 9-10am Eastern Time (6-7am Pacific, 1500-1600 CET, 1600-1700 Crete)

See <http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/> for time in other time zones.

Zakim Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 conference code 965732# ('XMLSEC') IRC Chat: irc.w3.org (port 6665), #xmlsec Web-based IRC (member-only): <http://cgi.w3.org/member-bin/irc/irc.cgi>

Please note that attendance of XMLSEC WG telecons is restricted to registered WG participants and persons invited by the chair.

Chair: Thomas Roessler

Regrets: Frederick Hirsch, Giles Hogben, Aleksey Sanin, Peter Lipp

1. Administrivia: scribe confirmation, next meeting

   PHB is expected to scribe. The current scribe list is at the end of this message.

   Scribe Instructions: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/Scribe-Instructions.html

   Next meeting: PROPOSED for 29 May, Thomas to chair, Giles to scribe.

2. Review and approval of last meeting's minutes http://www.w3.org/2007/05/15-xmlsec-minutes

3. Action item review

   We'll review action items that don't tie in with another agendum.

   For the full list of open actions, see: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/track/actions/open

   ACTION-5 Teach tracker about common aliases, on Thomas Roessler [DONE]

   ACTION-6 Share example for transform that depends on information beyond the transform input nodeset, on Konrad Lanz [review status]

   ACTION-22 Provide URI for additional algorithms, on Thomas Roessler [DONE]

   ACTION-26 draft CG note draft for submission to XML CG, on Thomas Roessler [CONTINUE]

4. Workshop planning

   ACTION-17 Draft CFP, on Thomas Roessler

   Done: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/ws/cfp.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0013.html

   ACTION-27 Put up WBS for known constraints in September/October, on Thomas Roessler

   Done: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40279/workshop-timing/results

   The results of that survey suggest September 26/27 or September 25/26.

   PROPOSED: To schedule the workshop for September 25/26.

   We have hosting offers from Europe and the West Coast.

   PROPOSED: To accept the hosting offer from BEA, San Jose.

5. Current status of drafts: C14N11 (from XML Core)

   ACTION-25 Post red-line link for C14N11, on Frederick Hirsch

   Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0028.html

   Per last meeting's decision, we do not anticipate to send any further feed-back to XML Core as a group.

   XML Core's draft transition request: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007May/0040

6. Current status of drafts: DSig Core

   Current draft: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/ http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/changes.html

   ACTION-19 Get test case for E01, on Konrad Lanz

   Review discussion of E05: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0006.html and thread

7. Current status of drafts: Decryption Transform

   Curent draft: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-decrypt.html

(I suspect that the following agenda items might be carried forward to the next meeting.)

1. Interop testing, participation expectations

   ACTION-12 Contact participants in previous interop testing, on Frederick Hirsch

   Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0018.html

   ACTION 18 Send e-mail about interop testing dependencies with Core, on Thomas Roessler

   Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0024.html

   Review interop testing expectations: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40279/interop-interest/results

   Discussion about this agendum is likely to be declared member-confidential.

2. Test cases

   i) Regression tests - original XML Signature and Decryption Transform cases Action to review and summarize?

   ii) test defined in new C14N11 example (as updated) <http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2007/05/CR-xml-c14n11-20070509>

   iii) E01 - see ACTION-19 Agreed at F2F that no tests needed for E02-E05

   iv) Action to review and summarize test for E06, test for base64 URI? Test exists but not well-defined?

   v) Action to summarize dditional tests?

   greg: test case for 1.0 as default see if 1.1 by mistake test case which checks for correct sig when xml:base is present test case which checks for correct sig when xml:id is present thomas: generate sig over doc subset, must include c14n11 as final transform greg: new generators not rely on default c14n Test case for conversion NodeSetData to OctetStreamData: Use case: Generate a signature having a reference with some xpath transform selecting NodeSetData then we add a XSLT transform that clearly needs OctetStreamData Check on verification: if the resulting signature actually made the use of c14n 1.1 explicit in the chain of transforms

3. Any other business

Regards,

Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>

Scribe list

Elisabetta Carrara Donald Eastlake Phillip Hallam-Baker (22 May 2007) Giles Hogben Konrad Lanz Peter Lipp Hal Lockhart Ram Mohan Anthony Nadalin Chris Nautiyal Rich Salz Daniel Schutzer Ed Simon Andrew Sullivan Panagiotis Trimintzios Tarun Tyagi Thomas Roessler (17 Apr 07) Greg Whitehead (F2F 2 May 07 am) Rob Miller (F2F 2 May 07 pm) Gregory Berezowsky (F2F 3 May 07 am) Sean Mullan (F2F 3 May 07 pm) Juan Carlos Cruellas (15 May 2007)

Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2007 08:56:34 UTC