Possible minor correction for MOVE Example in RFC 2518 from Hall, Shaun on 2001-07-25 (w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from July to September 2001) (original) (raw)

Couldn't see anything about this in the issues list and its minor.

RFC2518 Section 8.9.6 Example of MOVE request.

In the description below the example, it states "This means that the resource /container/C2/ could not be moved. However because there was an error copying /container/C2, none of the /containerC2's members were copied".

Er shouldn't the words "copying" and "copied" in the description be changed to "moving" and "moved" respectively as its a MOVE request ?

The MOVE example appears to be a cut/paste/modify of the COPY example in sec 8.8.8, which would explain things. Mmm, when have you seen that before ? Oh yes, writing source code :-)

Cheers

Shaun Hall Xerox Europe

Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2001 10:56:09 UTC