can-overwrite from Clemm, Geoff on 2002-10-16 (w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from October to December 2002) (original) (raw)

That works for me.

Jason: Can you add this to the 2518 issues list?

Cheers, Geoff

-----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]

So my vote would be to leave the BIND spec as it is, and to add an entry to the RFC2518 issues list saying that 4xx/5xx response bodies MAY use the DAV:error format defined in RFC3253. We could then start a separate activity to specify precondition names for common RFC2518 error conditions (such as parent collection must exist).

Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 00:14:34 UTC