telecon 2002-11-22 from Jan Grant on 2002-11-25 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from November 2002) (original) (raw)

Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0538.html

Transcript: http://www.w3.org/2002/11/22-rdfcore-irc

Scribe: This week jang (daveb assisted) Next week, jjc.

Roll call: Dave Beckett Dan Brickley Jeremy Carroll Dan Connolly Jos De Roo Jan Grant (scribe) Pat Hayes Frank Manola Brian McBride (chair) Eric Miller Steve Petschulat Patrick Stickler Aaron Swartz

Regrets: Mike Dean, Graham Klyne

Review agenda: No AOB.

Next telecon: Most WG members will be available, so the next telecon is scheduled for 10am Boston time, 29 November.

Minutes of last telecon: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0438.html APPROVED.

Confirm status of completed actions: ALL DONE.

Item 7: Test cases. [the rest of the telecon was devoted to the datatype test cases] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0447.html

The datatype test case discussion was long and involved (see transcript). Outcomes:

Pending editorial changes and small fixes, the test cases were approved, barring the cross-datatype entailment (although general feeling was that it also held). A decision on that was held back pending further email discussion.

ACTION 2002-11-22#1 (jang) ensure test cases themselves are named using frag IDs (see jjc's OWL test cases)

ACTION 2002-11-22#2 (jang) [test case fix] remove RDFS entailment rules from the language-ignored-for-numeric-types cases.

ACTION 2002-11-22#3 (path, jjc) Tie MT datatype to the sec that points out language isn't important to DT entailment thatexcept for rdf:XMLLiteral

ACTION 2002-11-22#4 (jjc) create an example.org DT-entailment showing that language is not relevant.

ACTION 2002-11-22#5 (jjc) check that RDF Concepts does not allow a synonym for rdf:XMLLiteral

ACTION 2002-11-22#6 (danc) review RDF Semantics, with a particular view to "define a language, not a software spec"

ACTION 2002-11-22#7 (jang) DT test case: range clashing with DT specification

There was discussion as to whether our current treatment of the interaction of datatyped literals and language could be improved.

ACTION 2002-11-22#8 (jjc) Liase with I18N people on whether they're happy with the DT/language setup as it is.

-- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ Strive to live every day as though it was last Wednesday.

Received on Monday, 25 November 2002 10:50:17 UTC