Delayed Minutes 06-06 from Jeremy Carroll on 2003-06-13 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from June 2003) (original) (raw)
RESOLVED: danc-02 as in 0027 RESOLVED: issue pfps-24 as in 2003May/0223 RESOLVED: issue pfps-25 as in 2003May/0225 RESOLVED: qu-04 as in May/0224 RESOLVED: To not accept webont-01 and stay with current terminology and usage. RESOVLED: to not accept vass-01
summary of actions:
Path to draft vass-01 response for the wg to send danbri change rdfs spec per 2003May/0223 danbri edit as in May/224 danbri respond to qu-04 danbri respond to pfps-025 danbri respond to pfps-024 danbri ask pfps-11 for text he would prefer danbri discuss #179 with peter concerning domains as well danbri to respond to webont-01 jjc Ask WebOnt for clear request to RDF Core for review of OWL Test jjc integrate value space of xml literal.
date: 20030606
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0021
IRC: http://www.w3.org/2003/06/06-rdfcore-irc
- Volunteer Scribe Jeremy Scribed
RollCall: FrankM, Emiller, PatH, GrahamKlyne daveb, jang jjc bwm danbri Mike_Dean jos
Review Agenda Added: OWL Test Cases, D�rst Comments
Issue danc-02 Goofy Literals
Proposal in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0027.html proposed: jjc seconded: gk carried unanaminously RESOLVED: danc-02 as in 0027
- Elements from the xml namespace
Chair grants Dave editorial descretion to deal with this question.
Do we have a definition of Arc?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0015.html
Suggested text: 'predicate arc in the pic' Also suggested: when moving to the RDF/XML talk about predicates.
Issue pfps-12 lists are not well formed (see later)
pfps-24 What is RDF Schema
Proposal in:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0223.html Proposed danbri, second PatH. No objections, so resolved.
RESOLVED: issue pfps-24 as in 2003May/0223 ACTION: danbri to change rdfs spec per 2003May/0223
- pfps-25 Schema semantics
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-25
Proposal in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0225.html Proposed danbri, second PatH.No objections, so resolved.
RESOLVED: issue pfps-25 as in 2003May/0225
- qu-04 RDF/XML representation
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#qu-04
Proposal in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0224.html
dave proposes this; danbri 2nds
No objections, resolved. RESOLVED: qu-04 as in May/0224 ACTION: danbri to edit as in May/224 ACTION: danbri to respond to qu-04 ACTION: danbri to respond to pfps-025 ACTION: danbri to respond to pfps-024
- webont-01 Rename RDF Schema
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#webont-01
Discussion: including: [[ never using 'rdf schema' in noun form, ie avoiding talk of their being things that are 'rdf schemas' (while leaving it in as a name for the basic rdf vocabulary description language defined by w3c, just as OWL is the name for W3C's 2nd RDF-based VDL). ]]
Proposal: We do not accept this comment and stay with current terminology and usage. Proposed DanBri, Second gk, Abstain EM. RESOLVED: To not accept webont-01 and stay with current terminology and usage. ACTION: danbri to respond to webont-01
- Vass-01 Flat layering
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#vass-01
Discussion of http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0253.html
jjc propose to not accept comment, danbri seconds resolved unaminous
RESOVLED: to not accept vass-01 ACTION: Path to draft vass-01 response for the wg to send
- Issue pfps-11 rdfs:comment implies entailments
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-11
Discussion of
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0222.html
resulting in: ACTION: danbri ask pfps-11 for text he would prefer
- Issue pfps-12 lists are not well formed http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-12
Peter has proposed some text he suggests he would prefer http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003AprJun/0179.html
Peter's suggested text does not describe the domain of rdf:first.
ACTION: danbri discuss #179 with peter concerning domains as well
AOB1 OWL Test Cases.
RDF Core will be asked for review. Reluctance to review all the tests.
ACTION: jjc Ask WebOnt for clear request to RDF Core for review of OWL Test
AOB2 D�rst comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0023 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0025
Dicussion concerning reopening XMLLiterals ...
Discussion concerning advice at Cannes plenary [[ Scribe note, i.e. these links found after telecon: See: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/ http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/rdfcore-i18n-irclog (critically 09:04 thru 09:12) ]]
ACTION: jjc integrate value space of xml literal.
swebscrape:N3:python: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/scripts/minutes2n3.py
Received on Friday, 13 June 2003 11:43:58 UTC