RDF Issue from Brian McBride on 2001-12-11 (www-rdf-comments@w3.org from October to December 2001) (original) (raw)
- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:31:47 +0000
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: 5.1.0.14.0.20011211152922.01fdac98@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com
Dan,
In
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001JanMar/0077.html
you raised an issue which was captured in
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-logical-formalism
as
[[[ There are gotchas in representing the current RDF model in a logical formalism. For example, a statement is defined as triple containing containing at least two, possibly three resources. Resources are not reasonable things to include in a triple. ]]]
As recorded in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0294.html
the RDFCore WG has decided to close this issue on the grounds:
The WG closes rdfms-logical-formalism on the grounds that the model theory adequately addresses this issue.
Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.
Brian McBride RDFCore co-chair
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2001 10:32:02 UTC