RDF Issue from Brian McBride on 2001-12-11 (www-rdf-comments@w3.org from October to December 2001) (original) (raw)

Dan,

In

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001JanMar/0077.html

you raised an issue which was captured in

http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-logical-formalism

as

[[[ There are gotchas in representing the current RDF model in a logical formalism. For example, a statement is defined as triple containing containing at least two, possibly three resources. Resources are not reasonable things to include in a triple. ]]]

As recorded in

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0294.html

the RDFCore WG has decided to close this issue on the grounds:

The WG closes rdfms-logical-formalism on the grounds that the model theory adequately addresses this issue.

Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.

Brian McBride RDFCore co-chair

Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2001 10:32:02 UTC