RDF Issue rdf-terminologicus from Brian McBride on 2002-02-18 (www-rdf-comments@w3.org from January to March 2002) (original) (raw)

• From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
• Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:54:25 +0000
• To: dehora@acm.org
• Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
• Message-Id: 5.1.0.14.0.20020218155034.06e92b90@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com

Bill,

In

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Dec/0152.html

you raised an issue which was captured in

http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-terminologicus

as

[[[ Communication and discussion within the community interested in RDF is hampered by lack of a disciplined terminology. It is suggested that a glossary of terms be developed to aid effective communication. This is a general issue for all RDF specifications. ]]]

As recorded in

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0476.html

the RDFCore WG resolved:

the WG resolves that this issue is addressed by the primer and that this issue be closed.

Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.

Brian McBride RDFCore co-chair

Received on Monday, 18 February 2002 10:56:00 UTC