RDF Issue rdfms-graph from Brian McBride on 2002-02-18 (www-rdf-comments@w3.org from January to March 2002) (original) (raw)

• From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
• Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:27:00 +0000
• To: Ron Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com>
• Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
• Message-Id: 5.1.0.14.0.20020218162156.04aaca58@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com

Ron,

In

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/1999Nov/0119.html

you raised an issue which was captured in

http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-graph

as

[[[ The RDF Model and Syntax specification does not cover the nature of RDF graphs in its formal model. ]]]

As recorded in

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0476.html

the RDFCore WG resolved:

the WG resolve that the model theory is a formal description of the properties of an RDF graph and that this issue be closed.

The formal definition of an RDF graph does not define a URI for for an RDF graph.

Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.

Brian McBride RDFCore co-chair

Received on Monday, 18 February 2002 11:29:01 UTC