RDF Issue rdfms-xmllang from Brian McBride on 2002-03-11 (www-rdf-comments@w3.org from January to March 2002) (original) (raw)

• From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
• Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:24:03 +0000
• To: timbl@w3.org
• Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
• Message-Id: 5.1.0.14.0.20020311142058.030d7358@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com

Tim,

In

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Feb/0172.html

you raised an issue which was captured in

http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xmllang

as

[[[ "This is a mess - it is in the syntax and not in the model. Should have used an RDF vocabulary for language. It should be removed from the syntax." ]]]

As recorded in

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/#d-2002-02-26-1

the RDFCore WG has resolved: [[ a literal consists of three components: o A representation of the parseType, which is a single bit o A language indicator which is a string as defined in XML o A fully normalized UNICODE string. ]]

Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.

Brian McBride RDFCore co-chair

Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 09:25:53 UTC