pfps-18,19,20,21 namespace v vocabulary from Brian McBride on 2003-03-21 (www-rdf-comments@w3.org from January to March 2003) (original) (raw)

Oops,

I forgot to copy the original to rdf comments.

Brian

Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:15:13 +0000 To: pfps@research.bell-labs.com From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Subject: pfps-18,19,20,21 namespace v vocabulary

Peter,

You made a last call comment which was recorded as a series of separate comments against different documents:

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-17 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-18 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-19 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-20 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-21

In your response to the RDFCore WG's resolution of pfps-17

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0505.html

you accepted the WG's resolution and indicated that a similar resolution was acceptable for the other documents.

Regarding the comments against the other docs pfps-18,19,20,21, the RDFCore WG has resolved:

[[ o throughout the docs - the term [xml namespace] be used to refer to xml namespaces - the term [vocabulary] be used to refer to collections of names (RDF URI References] o the editors update their docs accordingly o bwm responds to pfps for all these issues ]]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0124.html

Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this decision is acceptable.

Brian McBride

Received on Friday, 21 March 2003 08:07:46 UTC