XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem from Jeremy Carroll on 2003-09-18 (www-rdf-comments@w3.org from July to September 2003) (original) (raw)
With the right subject line this time.
Hi Peter,
I have liased with Dave Beckett,
Jeremy:
- syntax document
The editor will make appropriate changes in due course.
Please respond, copying www-rdf-comments, indicating whether this response is satisfactory or not.
Peter:
As there are no proposed changes to the syntax document, this response is incomplete.
The proposed changes are:
adding: [[ This string x MUST be in Unicode[UNICODE] NFC [NFC]" ]] for XML literals at 7.2.17 http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#parseTypeLiteralPropertyElt
modifying
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#literalPropertyElt
to replace [[
If the rdf:datatype attribute d is given then o := typed-literal(literal-value := t.string-value, literal-datatype := d.string-value) otherwise t.string-value MUST be a Unicode[UNICODE] string in Normal Form C[NFC], o := literal(literal-value := t.string-value, literal-language := e.language) and the ]]
with [[ The Unicode [UNICODE] string t.string-value MUST be in Normal Form C[NFC]. If the rdf:datatype attribute d is given then o := typed-literal(literal-value := t.string-value, literal-datatype := d.string-value), otherwise o := literal(literal-value := t.string-value, literal-language := e.language). The .. ]]
property attributes are adequately dealt with in 7.2.11 http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#nodeElement 7.2.21 http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#emptyPropertyElt
Are we any closer to knowing whether these responses are satisfactory or not?
See you,
Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2003 06:56:22 UTC