dissatisfaction with the entailment rules development from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2003-11-06 (www-rdf-comments@w3.org from October to December 2003) (original) (raw)

From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> Subject: Re: [closed] pfps-04, pfps-05: dissatisfaction with the entailment rules development Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:39:35 -0600

Well, it appears that there is nothing for me to do, as this thread has already been marked as closed.

The status of this, as i understand it, is that while we have indeed closed it, we did so under your objection. So my question may have been better phrased as, can we take it that you (now) find our response satisfactory, so that we are not obliged to record you as registering an objection to it?

Pat

Somehow I seem to have a continuing misunderstanding of the process.

However, for what it's worth, the proposed post-last-call-2 changes to the RDF Semantics document would make my objections here moot.

Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research

Received on Thursday, 6 November 2003 16:19:43 UTC