RDFS typographical issues from Aaron Swartz on 2001-02-22 (www-rdf-interest@w3.org from February 2001) (original) (raw)

Some minor typographical issues in RDFS:

1. The first XML example uses rdf:Description instead of the cleaner typeElt syntax. Is there any reason for this? I suggest it be changed for clarity.

2. The XML examples use unqualified attributes like ID. These should be replaced with the qualified rdf:ID.

3. RDFS should probably not include xml:lang since this is something likely to be modified by the RDF Core WG.

4. In section 4.1.3 the spec states: "a more comprehensive schema mapping mechanism for RDF may be developed in future W3C Activity." I believe this is a typo and should be either "in a future W3C Activity" or "in future W3C activities".

5. Section 3.1.1 includes much of the same information on rdfs:ConstraintResource as section 4.2. A link to section 4.2 should be added to section 3.1.1 and the duplicate wording should be considered for removal.

-- Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>| RSS Info <http://www.aaronsw.com> | <http://www.blogspace.com/rss/> AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237| news and information on the RSS format

Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2001 20:57:25 UTC