[css3-2d-transforms][css3-images] grammar is duplicated or points to the wrong spec from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2012-02-22 (www-style@w3.org from February 2012) (original) (raw)

On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com> wrote:

It seems the grammar for is duplicated in the definition of the transform-origin property 1, rather than being deferred to the one that can be found in css3-background 2

On the other hand, css3-images do try to point to its definition elsewhere, but they point to css3-values, which doesn't define it 3

Wow, I forgot how much this thread sidetracked.

Anyway, V&U does define , but it's in the ED, not the latest WD. The references are filled in automatically, unfortunately. So, I won't be making any change to the Images spec based on this.

Please indicate if this resolution is acceptable.

~TJ

Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 01:47:52 UTC