Update 3 of Minutes of July 25 Telecon from Leo Obrst on 2002-07-30 (www-webont-wg@w3.org from July 2002) (original) (raw)

Updated attendance list. Does anyone know the url for the IRC log?

=====

MINUTES OF JULY 25 TELECON

Chair: Jim Hendler Scribe: Leo Obrst

  1. ADMIN:

1.1) ROLL CALL

Present:

Borden Buswell Carroll Connolly De Roo De Roure Dean Finin Gibbins Heflin Hellman Hendler Klein Marchiori McGuinness Obrst Patel-Schneider Michael Smith Stanton Stein Thompson

Regrets:

Jonathan Dale Larry Eshelman Pat Hayes Libby Miller Marwan Sabbouh Guus Schrieber Frank van Harmelen Evan Wallace Chris Welty

1.2) ACTION ITEM REVIEW

ACTION: DanC to raise an issue wrt rdfs:subclassof and owl:subclassoff STATUS: DONE

ACTION: Connoly to get the OK'd for the OWL URI by the W3C webmaster/director; STATUS: DONE

ACTION: Pat will attempt to take abstract syntax, and Peter's MT and the mapping into RDF and will write a model theory in the Connolly style (i.e. as an extension to RDF MT) and see if he can identify the exact issues. Target deadline: three weeks (July 25). - change of due date to Aug 1. STATUS: CONTINUED

ACTION: Guus will generate a structure in which the examples should appear by July 11. Done

This will also include one example. Evan Wallace and Larry Eshelman: contribute examples STATUS: CONTINUED

ACTION: Evan will writeup a description of a recent OMG meeting that concerned UML and OWL, and the process he is running at OMG, and will post that to the WG. STATUS: CONTINUED

ACTION (all): send to WebOnt mailing list a short description of the tools you have available. or that you will use to help tools. STATUS: WITHDRAWN

ACTION (Raphael): will make a large ontology available to test readers. STATUS: CONTINUED.

ACTION: Hendler produce test for issue 4.2 STATUS: CONTINUED

ACTION: ChrisW to propose resolution of 3.4 and 4.1 STATUS: CONTINUED

ACTION: connolly review abstract syntax STATUS: DONE

ACTION: chairs - find photo of face to face example from the discussion of model theory. STATUS: CONTINUED

ACTION: Dan C. to work with Pat H to reconcile the issues of missing discussion of model theory in the log STATUS: CONTINUED

ACTION: Jim H will set up a straw poll based on the offers - this will include choices of Dec/Jan and place STATUS: CONTINUED

ACTION: Deb - add "property" to make sure we are using same terms. STATUS: DONE

ACTION: Deb to make sure names are same between her document and Mike's.

STATUS: DONE

ACTION: DanC to review Deb's final edits of feature document. STATUS: CONTINUED

ACTION: Mike will summarize changes in email to the list. (by next week)

STATUS: CONTINUED

ACTION: Peter - will review appendix C. STATUS: DONE

ACTION: JimH to draft press release - solicits input ASAP from WG members. STATUS: WITHDRAWN. Maybe around next f2f. W3C needs 1 month notice.

1.3) FACE TO FACE UPDATES:

f2f4 update (Jeremy)

Jeremy will give updates about hotels, etc. in 2 weeks. Web page: Dan will coordinate. F2F host will put up local web page.

ACTION: Dan Connolly will set up F2F registering. ACTION: Jeremy will put up a web page by next telecon.

f2f5 update (REMEMBER BIDS DUE BY THURS.) Bids: U. Manchester US NY region (IBM) US DC region (DARPA/UMCP/UMBC - not confirmed) US FL region (U W. Fl) NEW: US DC/Boston region (MITRE) straw poll to be held date: Mid Jan (poss late Dec)

Lynn: if we have 4 choices equally, would like to have eastern US as one choice. ACTION: Lynn and Dan to get on phone for details of straw poll. Jeremy: alternate between Europe and US? Jim: Jan is looking better than Dec. Will put on straw poll.

  1. DOCUMENT UPDATE: Status of three WDs

    Features – Deb

Deb: Action from f2f, all other actions done, don’t want to drop section 2 (per Peter’s request), did some other reorganization that Peter had requested. All edits are final. Formatting status: not validated fully yet. Dan is allowed to do edit markup.

Reference – Mike Dean Mike: ready to publish. A few comments yet to address, no text for class

expressions. OWL link, examples. Latest RDF core decisions not yet made.

Dan: XML syntax? Mike will leave these in. Maybe change to editorial note (Mike will do).

Mike: will do final edits, will be done in next day or so. Cross-links not yet done, and status.

Abst Syntax – Peter Peter: No change since last Thurs. No IP policy yet for the WG (Dan will do?) Any resolutions made today will be incorporated. Dan: tomorrow is best guess for all 3 publications to be published. ACTION: Dan will send mail to the WG when W3C publishes the documents. ACTION: Jim will solicit reviews for appropriate working groups. By Aug. 15

Process issues (if any) – Dan

Dan: has to point to patent disclosures, but since none yet, will point to nothing, but make sure if you have a patent in the works, notify DAN.

  1. PROPOSAL TO CLOSE ISSUES 3.4 AND 4.1 (UniqueProperty and UnambiguousProperty) Welty

Proposal: OWL FunctionalProperty OWL InverseFunctionalProperty

Many: Welty’s proposal is good. Jim: add 1-1 property? Peter: later Jim: straw poll: any objections? Mike: but can be 0-0 or 1-1. Resolution: unanimous. Adopted Chris Welty’s proposal. So, will go with what we have, not yet include 1-1. STATUS: RESOLVED.

See Chris Welty’s proposals: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Jul/0170.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Jul/0169.html

See Mike Smith’s Issues document: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I3.4-UnambiguousProperty

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I4.1-UniqueProp-BadName

ACTION: Mike Smith will close this out. Jim: someone has to do the TEST case. ACTION: Jeremy to do TEST case. ACTION: Deb, Mike, Peter to reflect this change in their documents, prior to release.

  1. PROPOSAL TO CLOSE ISSUE 2.4 (oneOf)

Ian was invited to discuss this, but nothing much showed up yet. Deb: he is still working on this. Dan: cardinality and oneOf interaction test case? Has anyone else seen this? Jeremy: has seen some, look hairy. Jim: no one has suggested we don’t have oneOf. Should we remove? It’s currently heavily used.

Straw Poll: No objections. No abstentions. PROPOSAL PASSES. Issue is CLOSED. STATUS: RESOLVED.

ACTION: Jim to write up a test case.

Should we have oneOf in OWL-Lite? Jeremy: Feature vs. Issue driven test cases? Dan: just use of oneOf. Entailment test. Jeremy: test cases to be in a hierarchy structure? Prefer to see feature-based test cases higher view. Jim: today we are closing everything that could affect the 3 docs. Next week, talk about next documents. August 15th: semantic issues. Probable cancel of Aug. 8th.

  1. PROPOSAL TO CLOSE ISSUE 4.6 (equivalentTo)

Jim: email looks like other opinions. Is there a consensus? Peter: 2 issues: 1) same individual as (2 names denote same) implies same class as and same property as (follows RDF view). Same property does not denote same individual. Dan: doesn’t affect the documents. ACTION: Peter will send out longer note and people to reply. Peter: by next week. ACTION: Jim will REMOVE proposal to close issue.

Class as instance discussion. Peter: model theory has a weak view of class as instance. Property defined-by attached to class. Average price property? First is not a property of the extension. Jim: can we close 4.6 because it’s subsumed by this issue (classes as instances). No, so just leave separate.

  1. OPENING OF ISSUE 5.20 (SHOULD OWL PROVIDE SYNONYMS FOR RDF AND RDFS OBJECTS?)

Jim: opening this issue, discuss, get feedback, send to email. Peter: nothing substantive; legalistic: D+O pulls into D+O namespace, but RDF will not pull into the RDF/S namespace (but RDF/S does not have capability).

OWL:PROPERTY: same denotation? RDFS:PROPERTY? Not to have the former in the OWL namespace when they’re both equivalent. Issue: will RDF tool understand what OWL:PROPERTY is?

Jim: at the last F2F, no resolution. Namespace of the identifier should be the definitive identifier. If we have a different model theory (different from RDF), then have a different namespace (i.e., OWL namespace). Do we need a separate model theory for OWL? Yes, for things not in the other language. If we extend RDF/s, need to have a model theory for this. Much discussion.

  1. AOB next telecon: Aug. 1 next scribe: Mike Smith

Aug. 8 meeting: cancelled.

--


Dr. Leo Obrst The MITRE Corporation mailto:lobrst@mitre.org Intelligent Information Management/Exploitation Voice: 703-883-6770 7515 Colshire Drive, M/S W640 Fax: 703-883-1379 McLean, VA 22102-7508, USA

Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2002 13:19:55 UTC