Minutes of teleconf 28 Feb '02 (for review) from Frank van Harmelen on 2002-03-04 (www-webont-wg@w3.org from March 2002) (original) (raw)
Minutes of the WebOnt teleconf on 28 Feb 2002, 18.00 - 19.30 CET. By Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl
AGENDA at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Feb/0267.html
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: Dan Connolly, David Trastour, Enrico Motta, Evan Wallace, Frank van Harmelen (scribe), Guus Schreiber, Herman ter Horst, Ian Horrocks, James Hendler, Jeff Heflin , Jeremy Carol (joined late), John Stanton, Jonathan Borden (left early), Jonathan Dale, Jos De Roo, Larry Eshelman, Libby Miller, Lynn Andrea Stein, Lyn Thomson, Marwan Sabbouh, Mike Dean, Michael Smith, Ora Lassila (left early), Peter Patel-Schneider, Ruediger Klein, Ziv Hellman,
REGRETS: Deborah McGuinness, Pat Hayes, Tim Finin.
ABSENT: Dieter Fensel, Einar Breen, Francesco Iannuzzelli, Laurent Olivry, Leo Obrst, Lynne R. Thompson, Martin Pike, Michael Kohlhase, Nicholas Gibbins, Oisen Hurley, Raphael Volz, Said Tabet, Shimizu Noboru, Stefan Decker, Stephen Buswell.
AGENDA ITEM 1) Action item review
ACTION van Harmelen: send hosting details A'dam ftf DONE (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Feb/0291.html) ACTION Chairs: update ftf schedule on group home page. OPEN ACTION Chairs: send to mailing list a proposed list of documents/outputs expected of the working group (tied to calendar if possible) and ask people to express interests in particular w/respect to those issues RESOLVED BY AGENDA ITEM 3 BELOW ACTION Heflin/Dale/Volz: new draft reqdoc by Monday 25 Feb DONE ACTION Chairs: put decision to publish on next week's agenda. DONE ACTION Hayes: propose wording for Annotation/tagging of ontologies DONE ACTION Carrol: suggest wording for "Lexical representations" DONE ACTION Connolly: suggest wording for "Integration of digital signatures." DONE
NEW ACTION ALL: register for A'dam F2F meeting (also in case of regrets) at http://www.w3c.nl/WGs/webont.html Do this a.s.a.p. because of pressure on available accommodation.
AGENDA ITEM 2) Requirements document
Heflin states belief that he has responded to all items on the mailing list
open issues are:
- digital signature proposed text is being discussed RESOLUTION: DanC's original text at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Feb/0278.html is being accepted
- issue raised by Ian: using the term "definition" RESOLUTION: chair will choose terminology on the ground of terminology is non-technical by default, unless specified otherwise
- issue raised by Ian: definitional constraints on conjunctive types RESOLUTION: this objective will be dropped
- issue raised by Ian: wording on variables is too vague RESOLUTION: dropped as objective, we keep a reminder to discuss this in the future
- issue raised by Ian: wording and provenance on view mechanism are too vague RESOLUTION: objective is kept unchanged after discussion
- question from MikeD: is unique names a req of objective? RESOLUTION: kept as is (ie a req.) no further issues raised
chair requests mailing list for maintenance of the document and this list should be mentioned in the doc.
NEW ACTION Connolly: set up this mailing list NEW ACTION on editors of reqdoc: include mailing list in doc NEW ACTION on editors of reqdoc: verify W3C guidelines on syntax & structure
PROPOSAL: chair proposes to publish the current doc as a working draft RESOLUTION: proposal to publish (after edits) accepted by consensus
NEW ACTION on Mike Smith: setup repository of "open issues"
The group expresses thanks to the editors and in particular Jeff Heflin for their hard work
AGENDA ITEM 3) focus areas
ACTION ALL: register interest in focus groups: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Feb/0250.html
(NOTE FROM SCRIBE: interests voiced during teleconf or on chat-channel are not recorded, please register your interests via email as requested)
All focus areas are being discussed and clarified RESOLUTION: consensus on the descriptions that were on the mailing list RESOLUTION: consensus is reached on co-evolution of the focus-groups RESOLUTION: all email will still happen on the central mailing list RESOLUTION: focus groups have no decision power RESOLUTION: email labelling should indicate focus-group, RESOLUTION: email labelling should also indicate when email is relevant for people outside the focus group
AGENDA ITEM 4) AOB
- items for next week: OWL lite
- email other agenda items to chairs
Received on Sunday, 3 March 2002 19:41:35 UTC