Minutes from 2/13/2003 Telecon from Jeff Heflin on 2003-02-13 (www-webont-wg@w3.org from February 2003) (original) (raw)

WEB ONTOLOGY WORKING GROUP TELECON February 13, 2003

Chair: Guus Schreiber Scribe: Jeff Heflin

Chat Log: http://www.w3.org/2003/02/13-webont-irc#T19-00-40

  1. ADMIN (10-15 min)

1.1 Role Call

Present: NickG, DanC, PeterFPS, JeffHeflin, IanH, LeoObrst, ChrisW, Marwan_Sabbouh, Yassar, Baget, PatH, M_Smith, Evan_Wallace, DeborahMcG, MikeDean

Joined Late: ZivH, Guus, Jeremy, JosD

Regrets: Dale, Hendler, Klein, van Harmelen, Hori

1.2 Approval of Minutes of last telecon

ACCEPTED the following as a true record of Feb 6 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0126.html

1.3 Agenda Amendments

None

1.4 Telecon Schedule

Next telecon: February 20 Scribe: Leo Orbst

1.5 Tech plenary

Tech plenary page: http://www.w3.org/2002/10/allgroupoverview.html

Deb would like to have speaker phone at meeting

  1. STATUS RDFCore LC REVIEWS (15-20 min.)

2.1 RDF Schema

Review by Volz: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0064.html

Discussion about "social meaning." Although, WG members disagree on this topic, most feel the wording should at least be clarified

ACTION: Guus will do summary review of this doc

2.2 RDF Semantics

Agenda item postponed

2.3 RDF Concepts

baget's review of concepts, plus a couple other messages http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2003Feb/0056.html

Jeremey suggested that social meaning be discussed at tech plenary

3 ISSUETTES (60-75 min)

3.1 Annotations

See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0490.html

RESOLVED: to adopt Peter's Proposal 2 (from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0128.html) with an explcit type label for annotation properties (e.g. owl:AnnotationProperty) (abstains: Ian, Jos DeRoo, Mike Dean, Mike Smith)

ACTION: Jeremy to add 0542 case to test suite ACTION Schreiber: explain AnnototationProperty in ref ACTION Schreiber: specify in owl.owl that label, seeAlso, isDefinedBy
ACTION: Mike will update guide to discuss annotations

3.2 Imports and entailments

ACTION: Ian to get Sean to generate syntax checker test case for imports (i.e., on failure assume doc is OWL-FULL)

ACTION Jos: send negative experience on imports to list

3.3 rdf:XMLLiteral, xml:lang in OWL Lite

Dan: Use case for XML literals and cardinality constraints: A product has XML descriptions in different files, but can only have one description. Are the two files consistent?

RESOLVED: abstract syntax uses same syntax as RDF for literals (abstains: Connolly)

ACTION Jeremy: to produce test case for XML literal

3.4 RDF compatibility

Item not discussed

3.5 OWL DL syntax

Item not discussed

3.6 Relation OWL Lite with RDF(S)

Item not discussed

  1. DOCUMENT STATUS (10-15 min.)

RESOLVED: rename AS&S to S&AS (Semantics & Abstract Syntax). (Abstain: Pat)

ACTION: Massimo publish reference (continued) ACTION: Connolly get Tests published

Received on Thursday, 13 February 2003 14:35:59 UTC