[Where is type inherence ?] Re: Proposal: Simplified syntax for dealing with parameterized types. (original) (raw)
rssh at gradsoft.com.ua rssh at gradsoft.com.ua
Mon Mar 23 14:12:01 PDT 2009
- Previous message: Proposal: Simplified syntax for dealing with parameterized types (correction to ALTERNATIVES section)
- Next message: [Where is type inherence ?] Re: Proposal: Simplified syntax for dealing with parameterized types.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Just my 2 cents:
I think, that if we move in this direction, than constructor type inference must be on first place, simplified constructors syntax - second, all other like this proposal - third. Otherwise set of language features will be unbalanced.
BTW, are type inference proposal was submitted ? May be somebody have plans to do this ? Or exists some consensus that this is not in project coin ?
Some links: http://gafter.blogspot.com/2007/07/constructor-type-inference.html // Neal, what you think now ?
Exists implementation http://weblogs.java.net/blog/forax/archive/2006/12/call_me_santa.html
It was in Java 7 wish list. http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/java_se_7_wish_list
- Previous message: Proposal: Simplified syntax for dealing with parameterized types (correction to ALTERNATIVES section)
- Next message: [Where is type inherence ?] Re: Proposal: Simplified syntax for dealing with parameterized types.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]