JDK 8 code review request for 6380161 (reflect) Exception from newInstance() not chained to cause. (original) (raw)
Sebastian Sickelmann sebastian.sickelmann at gmx.de
Mon Aug 8 14:24:03 UTC 2011
- Previous message: JDK 8 code review request for 6380161 (reflect) Exception from newInstance() not chained to cause.
- Next message: JDK 8 code review request for 6380161 (reflect) Exception from newInstance() not chained to cause.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Looks good to me.
But i have one question:
Why there are two ways to plumb the causes of an exception?
In many exceptions-classes you can use a constuctor-level argument
to specify the cause, and in some classes you must use the initCause method.
Is it: "When you often need a cause at creation-time than we got a
specializes constructor." ?
I found 500+ lines jdk/src/share/classes/**/*.java where i found
line like
XYZException iae = new XYZException();
iae.initCause(e);
throw iae;
I am searching a minor project for my second Contribution to
OpenJDK to learn more about the developement / review process. Is it worthwhile to look at this issue and maybe refactor some of the often used Exceptions to accept a cause at construction-time?
- Sebastian
Am 08.08.2011 07:24, schrieb Joe Darcy:
Hello.
Please review this small fix, developed after I went through my open bug list; patch below, webrev at: 6380161 (reflect) Exception from newInstance() not chained to cause. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/6380161.0/ Several call to initCause are added to plumb up caused-by exception chains to exception types without constructors taking a cause. In addition, multi-catch is added in on location. I looked for similar issues in Constructor, Method, and Executable, but there weren't any. Thanks, -Joe --- old/src/share/classes/java/lang/Class.java 2011-08-07 22:21:58.000000000 -0700 +++ new/src/share/classes/java/lang/Class.java 2011-08-07 22:21:58.000000000 -0700 @@ -349,7 +349,8 @@ }); cachedConstructor = c; } catch (NoSuchMethodException e) { - throw new InstantiationException(getName()); + throw (InstantiationException) + new InstantiationException(getName()).initCause(e); } } Constructor tmpConstructor = cachedConstructor; @@ -973,7 +974,8 @@ descriptor = (String) enclosingInfo[2]; assert((name != null && descriptor != null) || name == descriptor); } catch (ClassCastException cce) { - throw new InternalError("Invalid type in enclosing method information"); + throw (InternalError) + new InternalError("Invalid type in enclosing method information").initCause(cce); } } @@ -1239,7 +1241,8 @@ try { return getName().substring(enclosingClass.getName().length()); } catch (IndexOutOfBoundsException ex) { - throw new InternalError("Malformed class name"); + throw (InternalError) + new InternalError("Malformed class name").initCause(ex); } } @@ -2954,9 +2957,8 @@ } // These can happen when users concoct enum-like classes // that don't comply with the enum spec. - catch (InvocationTargetException ex) { return null; } - catch (NoSuchMethodException ex) { return null; } - catch (IllegalAccessException ex) { return null; } + catch (InvocationTargetException | NoSuchMethodException | + IllegalAccessException ex) { return null; } } return enumConstants; }
- Previous message: JDK 8 code review request for 6380161 (reflect) Exception from newInstance() not chained to cause.
- Next message: JDK 8 code review request for 6380161 (reflect) Exception from newInstance() not chained to cause.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]