(original) (raw)
Michael,
I think the best way to handle the coordination is in two steps.
I'd like to get my Linux-clone changes in first (you should review,
I will commit)
and then we switch hats and I will review your Solaris changes.
It seems best to do this in two steps: to better place blame when
it breaks (this is very tricky stuff to get right).
If you agree, please review my posted changes.
Aside: Instead of griping about the missing execvpe,
I filed a bug against glibc, and was surprised to find
that Ulrich Drepper had implemented it a couple of days later.
It will probably be in glibc-2.11.� Perhaps in 5 years we can
use it ourselves...).� Thanks, Uli!
Martin
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 07:29, Michael McMahon <Michael.McMahon@sun.com> wrote:
Martin,
I had done something similar with clone & exec for Linux, but hadn't got round to testing it.
So, it seems reasonable to take yours. Do you want to send me your updated versions of
process_md.c and the test? I can take care of the merge with the Solaris code.