(original) (raw)

Patrick Maupin schrieb:
> On 3/18/07, Georg Brandl <g.brandl@gmx.net> wrote:
>> I just want to add that I've adapted and extended Thomas' original patch

>> for the 0o123 syntax. It should be pretty complete.
>>
>> Open issues would probably be:
>> - should int("0755", 0) give 0o755? (IMO yes)
>
> The PEP covers this, with the answer current of "yes" for
2.6 and
> "exception" for 3.0.  (It presumes int(x, 0) should be the same as the
> compiler tokenizer result.)

It isn't. We already said that int() should continue to accept "0x" and "0X"

prefixes for hexadecimal, for instance.