(original) (raw)

Hi Brett,

Stability doesn't appear to be a problem, but we have much less
parallelism on AppVeyor than we do on Travis-CI. This may make waiting
times longer than they used to be.

Apparently 3.6 builds (and perhaps 2.7) trigger two sequential AppVeyor
jobs:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/python/cpython/build/3.6build10551

Regards

Antoine.


Le 10/01/2018 à 21:45, Brett Cannon a écrit :
\> I just switched it on to help make sure we don't break on Windows just
\> before hitting beta. If it turns out AppVeyor isn't stable enough I will
\> switch it back off.
\>
\>
\> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\> python-committers mailing list
\> python-committers@python.org
\> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
\> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
\>
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/