(original) (raw)
Python 3 runs builds against the old MSVC (14.0) and the current one (14.1). I’m happy to fully drop support for the older one and remove those builds, but there was a bit of push back when first proposed. (Both toolsets produce binary compatible outputs, but the newer one has better library/compiler support and we may break people who don’t want to upgrade if we use it.)
Top-posted from my Windows phone
From: Brett Cannon
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 11:49
To: Antoine Pitrou
Cc: python-committers
Subject: Re: \[python-committers\] AppVeyor is now required to pass on PRs
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 at 14:42 Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org> wrote:
Hi Brett,
Stability doesn't appear to be a problem, but we have much less
parallelism on AppVeyor than we do on Travis-CI. This may make waiting
times longer than they used to be.
Apparently 3.6 builds (and perhaps 2.7) trigger two sequential AppVeyor
jobs:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/python/cpython/build/3.6build10551
If the wait times become an issue for anyone then let me know and we can re-evaluate the situation.
-Brett
Regards
Antoine.
Le 10/01/2018 à 21:45, Brett Cannon a écrit :
> I just switched it on to help make sure we don't break on Windows just
> before hitting beta. If it turns out AppVeyor isn't stable enough I will
> switch it back off.
>
>
> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/