[Python-Dev] Anyone against having a loop option for regrtest? (original) (raw)
Collin Winter collinw at gmail.com
Tue Jun 30 04:22:08 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Anyone against having a loop option for regrtest?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Anyone against having a loop option for regrtest?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Jesse Noller<jnoller at gmail.com> wrote:
Something that's been helping me squirrel out "wacky" and "fun" bugs in multiprocessing is running the tests in a loop - sometimes hundreds of times. Right now, I hack this up with a bash script, but I'm sitting here wondering if adding a "loop for x iterations" option to regrtest.py would be useful to others as well.
Any thoughts? Does anyone hate this idea with the power of a thousand suns?
+1 for having this in regrtest. I've wished for this in the past, and ended up going the bash route, same as you.
Collin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Anyone against having a loop option for regrtest?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Anyone against having a loop option for regrtest?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]