[Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3 (original) (raw)

Vinay Sajip vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Feb 28 16:39:47 CET 2012

Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka gmail.com> writes:

Another pertinent question: "What are disadvantages of PEP 414 is adopted?"

It's moot, but as I see it: the purpose of PEP 414 is to facilitate a single codebase across 2.x and 3.x. However, it only does this if your 3.x interest is 3.3+. If you also want to or need to support 3.0 - 3.2, it makes your workflow more painful, because you can't run tests on 2.x or 3.3 and then run them on 3.2 without an intermediate source conversion step - just like the 2to3 step that people find painful when it's part of maintenance workflow, and which in part prompted the PEP in the first place.

Regards,

Vinay Sajip

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list