(original) (raw)

On 7/12/06, Anthony Baxter <anthony@interlink.com.au> wrote:

On Thursday 13 July 2006 14:46, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Thanks for confirming memory! So it was an intentional regression;
> "bugs happen" doesn't apply in this case. And an unfortunate
> regression at that -- not because one guy writes a silly blog entry

> about it, but because it breaks real code -- undocumented be
> damned.
>
> Are we going to fix it, without allowing those crashes again?

I already said "yes" for 2.5. Brett, can you work up a patch?

Yep, it's on my todo list and will get done. Might have to wait until next week, though (if that is okay), since my girlfriend is leaving town Sunday and thus I will have a ton more time after that.

-Brett