(original) (raw)

> I'm sceptical that these would find use in practice.
> [..]
> Also, I question the utility of maintaining a weakref to a method or
> attribute instead of holding one for the object or class.  As long as

> the enclosing object or class lives, so too will their methods and
> attributes.  So what is the point of a tighter weakref granualarity?

i didn't just came up with them "out of boredom", i have had specific

use cases for these, mainly in rpyc3000... but since the rpyc300
code base is still far from completion, i don't want to give examples
at this early stage.

however, these two are theoretically useful, so i refactored them out

of my code into recipes.


-tomer

On 9/28/06, Raymond Hettinger <python@rcn.com> wrote:

> Also, I question the utility of maintaining a weakref to a method or
> attribute instead of holding one for the object or class.

Strike that paragraph -- the proposed weakattrs have references away from the

object, not to the object.


Raymond