(original) (raw)

I was reading GvR's post on this and came up with a theory on how to tackle the problem.

I ended up putting it in a blog post.

http://www.brainwavelive.com/blog/index.php?/archives/12-Suggestion-for-removing-the-Python-Global-Interpreter-Lock.html
What do you think?

Prateek

On Sep 12, 2007, at 9:08 PM, skip@pobox.com wrote:


� � Martin> Now we are getting into details: you do NOT have to lock an
� � Martin> object to modify its reference count. An atomic
� � Martin> increment/decrement operation is enough.

Implemented in asm I suspect?For common CPUs this could just be part of
the normal Python distribution.For uncommon ones this could use a lock
until someone gets around to writing the necessary couple lines of
assembler.

Skip
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/surekap%40gmail.com