(original) (raw)
On Jan 27, 2008 6:08 PM, Christian Heimes <lists@cheimes.de> wrote:
Does it? The gc module is specific to the cyclic-gc system. I don't see that this method is. If cyclic-gc is unavailable, should this function be unavailable too?
Brett Cannon wrote:Yeah, good idea. The gc module makes sense.
> Ignoring whether this is the right thing to do, should this be in sys or in gc?
Does it? The gc module is specific to the cyclic-gc system. I don't see that this method is. If cyclic-gc is unavailable, should this function be unavailable too?
--
Thomas Wouters <thomas@python.org>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!