(original) (raw)
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:36 AM, <skip@pobox.com> wrote:
yes, you're right. but I didn't feel like writing a strftime implementation (which has probably even less chance of being committed). This patch is rather tiny, it's easy to understand and it works now.
It's actually not xmlrpclib which has the limitation, but
datetime.strftime(). That's a known limitation. Here's the comment in the
datetime code:
[snip]
Personally, I don't think patching xmlrpclib is the right place to "fix"
this problem. It's possible that the datetime comment is no longer correct
yes, you're right. but I didn't feel like writing a strftime implementation (which has probably even less chance of being committed). This patch is rather tiny, it's easy to understand and it works now.
and that limitation should be reconsidered. I see no other mention of
PYTHON2K in any .c, .h or .py files in the trunk.
Skip