(original) (raw)
Dear Greg,
Thanks for your email.
Thanks, that's exactly what I was looking for when I asked:
Case closed.
Sincerely,
--
S�bastien Loisel
PS:
I know, I was demolishing PEP 211, not trying to support my point.
Thanks for your email.
Guido is on record as opposing any kind of macros
or other "extensible syntax", and this probably comes
under the same heading.
Thanks, that's exactly what I was looking for when I asked:
Now since this is such a simple idea, I'm guessing it occured to pythonistas at some point in 1992, and got voted down and that decision has now become scripture. Is that the case?
Case closed.
Sincerely,
--
S�bastien Loisel
PS:
This argues for a function such as solve(A, b). It
doesn't argue for an infix operator.
I know, I was demolishing PEP 211, not trying to support my point.