(original) (raw)

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:

Which I still have to review. (Mark, if you're there, could you make a

brief post here on the mathematical definition of the new hash you're

proposing, and why it is both efficient to compute and good (enough)

as a hash function?)

Never mind, Mark. I found your explanation here:
http://codereview.appspot.com/660042/diff/19001/11009?column\_width=80