(original) (raw)
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 13:17, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:02:00 -0600I don't know who did that page but it seems like there's some FUD there.
Brian Curtin <brian.curtin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:51, Prashant Kumar <contactprashantat@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone. My name is Prashant. I and my friend Zubin recently
> > ported 'Configobj'. It would be great if somebody can suggest about
> > any utilities or scripts that are being widely used and need to be
> > ported.
>
> http://onpython3yet.com/ might be helpful to you. It orders the projects on
> PyPI with the most dependencies which are not yet ported to 3.x.
simplejson, ctypes, pysqlite and others are available in the 3.x
stdlib.
It grabs the info from their PyPI pages, which are probably not kept up-to-date.
This was brought up at a local user group meeting and I think it can be a useful tool, but as you can see it requires good input data which isn't always the case for some packages.
Package authors: if you spent time making your project work on 3.x -- let the world know, update your classifiers.