(original) (raw)
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Vinay Sajip <vinay\_sajip@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Hmm, that may not have built correctly, since it isn't showing up in the web version of the dev docs yet. I skimmed the diff on python-checkins though, and it looked good to me.
I think the revised docs should make it \*much\* easier for people to get a handle on how the logging system works (I know my own understanding of it is significantly better than it was a couple of weeks ago).
Cheers,
Nick.
P.S. I'm off visiting family for a couple of weeks, so my email access is going to be sketchy for a while.
-- > Yep, that's what I had assumed you were going to do (this did come upOk, I've now checked in this change, and would be grateful for any feedback.
> in the big thread about the logging docs, but you may have missed it).
>
Time for a break :-)
Hmm, that may not have built correctly, since it isn't showing up in the web version of the dev docs yet. I skimmed the diff on python-checkins though, and it looked good to me.
I think the revised docs should make it \*much\* easier for people to get a handle on how the logging system works (I know my own understanding of it is significantly better than it was a couple of weeks ago).
Cheers,
Nick.
P.S. I'm off visiting family for a couple of weeks, so my email access is going to be sketchy for a while.
Nick Coghlan�� |�� ncoghlan@gmail.com�� |�� Brisbane, Australia