(original) (raw)
I don't find 'major' and 'minor' confusing too. Maybe because it is the designation used in linux community for years.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Rob Cliffe <rob.cliffe@btinternet.com> wrote:
But "minor version" and "major version" are readily understandable to the general reader, e.g. me, whereas "feature release" and "release series" I find are not. �Couldn't the first two terms be defined once and then used throughout?
Rob Cliffe
On 10/01/2012 04:05, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 1/9/2012 8:52 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Antoine Pitrou<solipsis@pitrou.net> �wrote:
Please avoid using the terms "minor version" and "major version", they
are confusing.
Indeed. "Feature release" (2.7, 3.2, 3.3) and "release series" (2.x,
3.x) are the least confusing terms we have available.
I minimally edited what was already there to correct what is now an error. The change comes immediately after a section defining major, minor, and micro releases. To change terms,
http://docs.python.org/devguide/devcycle.html
and possibly other pages needs more extensive editing.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/anthony.hw.kong%40gmail.com