(original) (raw)

On 17 January 2012 09:23, Paul McMillan <paul@mcmillan.ws> wrote:

This is why the "simply throw an error" solution isn't a complete fix.
Making portions of an interface unusable for regular users is clearly
a bad thing, and is clearly applicable to other types of poisoned data
as well. We need to detect collisions and work around them
transparently.

What if in a pathological collision (e.g. > 1000 collisions), we increased the size of a dict by a small but random amount? Should be transparent, have neglible speed penalty, maximal reuse of existing code, and should be very difficult to attack since the dictionary would change size in a (near) non-deterministic manner when being attacked (i.e. first attack causes non-deterministic remap, next attack should fail).

It should also have near-zero effect on existing tests and frameworks since we would only get the non-deterministic behaviour in pathological cases, which we would presumably need new tests for.

Thoughts?

Tim Delaney