(original) (raw)

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:20, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin@v.loewis.de> wrote:

> I find that strange, especially for an expert Python dev. I, a newbie,
> find it far friendlier (and easier for a new programmer to grasp).
> Maybe it's because I use it all the time, and you don't?

That is most likely the case. You learn by practice. For that very
reason, the claim "and easier for a new programmer to grasp" is
difficult to prove. It was easier for \*you\*, since you started using
it, and then kept using it. I don't recall any particular obstacles
learning % formatting (even though I did for C, not for C++).
Generalizing that it is \*easier\* is invalid: you just didn't try
learning that instead first, and now you can't go back in a state
where either are new to you.

C++ is very similar here: they also introduced a new way of output
(iostreams, and << overloading). I used that for a couple of years,
primarily because people said that printf is "bad" and "not object-
oriented". I then recognized that there is nothing wrong with printf
per so, and would avoid std::cout in C++ these days, in favor of
std::printf (yes, I know that it does have an issue with type safety).

Not to mention that the performance of iostreams is pretty bad, to the extent that some projects actively discourage using them in favor of either C-style IO (fgets, printf, etc.) or custom IO implementations. This is marginally off-topic, although it does show that an initial thought of deprecating an existing functionality for new one doesn't always work out in the long run, even for super-popular languages like C++.

Eli

_______________________________________________

Python-Dev mailing list

Python-Dev@python.org

http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev

Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/anacrolix%40gmail.com