(original) (raw)
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:17:06 -0400Then they should also replace the select module.
PJ Eby <pje@telecommunity.com> wrote:
> That's not really the point; the frameworks that implement nonblocking I/O
> by replacing the socket module (and Stackless is only one of many) won't be
> using that code.
That actually sounds like a good point. �;-)
I'm not the maintainer of any of those frameworks, but IIRC some of them \*do\* replace it. �Perhaps this would solve Stackless's problem here too?