(original) (raw)

On May 31, 2012 1:31 AM, "Guido van Rossum" <guido@python.org> wrote:
>
> Agreed this could go on the tracker, but I don't see the need for a Python-Ideas detour.

+1

> It seems worth fixing (and I vaguely recall there was some follow-up last time?).

You may be thinking of the abstract property fixes that went in - I'm fairly sure this specific problem report fell through the cracks.

Cheers,
Nick.

--
Sent from my phone, thus the relative brevity :)