(original) (raw)

On 8 May 2013 01:26, "Antoine Pitrou" <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:
\>
\> Le Wed, 8 May 2013 01:03:38 +1000,
\> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> a �crit :
\> >
\> > What if there was a variant of the class statement that bound the
\> > result of a function call rather than using the normal syntax:
\> >
\> > � � class Animal from enum.Enum(members="dog cat bear")
\>
\> Apparently you're trying hard to invent syntaxes just to avoid
\> subclassing.

Yeah, just accepting an auto-numbered "members" arg still seems cleaner to me. If we decouple autonumbering from using the functional API, then the rules for pickle support are simple:
\* use the class syntax; or
\* pass a fully qualified name.

The fragile getframe hack should not be propagated beyond namedtuple.

Cheers,
Nick.

>
\> Regards
\>
\> Antoine.
\>
\>
\> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\> Python-Dev mailing list
\> Python-Dev@python.org
\> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
\> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com