(original) (raw)

On Sep 16, 2013 1:17 AM, "Antoine Pitrou" <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:

Le Sun, 15 Sep 2013 06:46:08 -0700,
Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> a �crit :
\> I see PEP 428 is both targeted at 3.4 and still in draft status.
\>
\> What remains to be done to ask for pronouncement?

I think I have a couple of items left to integrate in the PEP.
Mostly it needs me to take a bit of time and finalize the PEP, and
then have a PEP delegate (or Guido) pronounce on it.

That's unless someone else wants to add it, of course. I don't mind
suggestions, as long as they don't deter from the short-/middle-term
goal of getting the PEP approved :)

Note that the pathlib API has to be provisional. While "OO path
objects" have been a common desire for a long time, it is a much less
well-paved avenue than e.g. TransformDict :)

Regards

Antoine.


\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org